|
PDF
DOWNLOAD HERE
EDITORIAL:
Blow-In is the culmination of Danger Museum’s encounters
with Cork over the past year and our conversations with some of the city’s
cultural community. 13 interviews are compiled in this publication, while
collage pieces are shown in Cork Public Museum. The project continues
a line of pieces investigating cultural scenes, such as Peanut Circuit
(2003) and Radio Hue (2004). Both employed the interview to take
the pulse of the art worlds of, respectively, Oslo and Seoul and formed
the basis for interpretation through visual and sculptural pieces.
This project has evolved in response to conversations and to our experience
as outsiders, or ‘blow-ins’, to the city during three visits.
The first gave us a general picture through informal meetings, sightseeing
and a presentation at the Crawford Municipal Gallery. During our return
in March this year, our impression altered due to the affect of Cork 2005
on the city.
Blow-in is an Irish term that, depending on the situation, can be positive
or negative - welcome fresh blood, or someone who doesn’t belong.
In a wider sense it resonates with issues that came up in the conversations,
such as small-town mentalities, regeneration and the desire to leave.
The term also fits in with some of our thoughts on contemporary artistic
practice in general. The artist residency has become a mode and site of
work in itself. Residencies can be peculiar in their aim to make themes
or match people up who otherwise would never have met, or who may not
have wanted to work together. Although a constructed situation, being
parachuted into a place often becomes the starting point for a piece for
us. The anxiety of parachuting can indeed be compared to our feeling of
coming to Cork: falling through the clouds, getting a clearer picture,
but then not knowing whether the landing will be a success.
We thought interviews would be a way of shortcutting into the public opinion,
to get an understanding of Cork’s art scene. We asked people we
had grown familiar with - mostly artists - and some from outside our temporary
Cork circle, such as people in institutions and administrations, a student
and a museum porter. Together they form a spectrum of the Cork scene.
It is not a democratic survey but reflects our meeting with Cork, starting
with curator Grant Watson introducing us to Ali Robertson of the Cork
Midsummer Festival a year ago. It is important to stress that airing the
opinions in this booklet is not an attempt at directing criticism.
The conversations have worked as input for a set of collages but are also
meant as verbal records of some of Cork’s cultural participants.
The representation is approximately 50/50 Cork people and newcomers. They
speak about the framework for art in Cork, how to improve conditions and
the significance of the Capital of Culture to the city. The moods shift
between patriotism, scepticism, hope and cynicism about practicing in
Cork today.
Our collage allegories over the city introduce other stuff that attracted
us in Cork – architecture, local sceneries and animal life, as well
as its charm. We see Cork as a small town of many talents, where being
a big fish can be both good and bad. It has become the retreat for many
big city getaways, a comfortable yet also inhibiting place for those with
ambitions. And it has to be experienced over time to be made sense of,
dug out of the mist or, if you like, brewery steam. Yet as you read the
interviews certain things reoccur. Even if you never visit Cork, this
gives you an idea of the scale of the city. People have their heads in
clouds, some look beyond the city border and some have made a life-long
commitment here.
Cork Public Museum is located in Fitzgerald Park, the grounds of the Cork
International Exhibition of 1902/03. The museum’s permanent collection
displays relics of the event. Souvenirs, pieces of china, a season ticket.
We are particularly interested in a dried-up cigar which, according to
the museum’s porter, was given to the Lord Mayor of Cork, Fitzgerald,
by King Edward VII at the luncheon held during the king’s visit.
Cork International Exhibition would have outshone Cork 2005 many times
over in terms of size and investment. It was huge at the time, yet today
it has nearly disappeared from the city’s memory. If the Cork International
Exhibition failed at a long-lasting impact and placing Cork on the world's
cultural map, how can the city make it this time?
Looking at the remains of Cork 1902/03, we can’t help wondering
what will be left after Cork 2005 proclaimed “the greatest year”
since the International Exhibitions, by the current Lord mayor of Cork.
After our time in Cork, we guess that the kind of events that will make
changes, will not be the spectacular ones, but those where it is invested
in longer processes. The realisation of Blow-In and its effects on our
practice and future relationship with Cork, will perhaps be an example
of this. (although we love fireworks...)
The interviews address the long-term effects of Cork 2005, and it felt
right to place this discourse on the backdrop of this other (half-forgotten)
international event.
To commemorate the potential of progress – or oblivion - of the
year 2005 for Cork, we donate a cigar-shaped textile testimonial, made
by Tokuko Shimizu, to the city. The ceremony takes place on the day of
the exhibition opening and as a homage to the optimism of the Cork International
Exhibition and a pun on the blown-in artist; we deliver the cigar by parachute.
Danger Museum, June 2005
|
|